Where it appears in the exam
What is it?
This competency covers the verbs that require another verb in the -ing form: enjoy reading, avoid spending, suggest going. Nothing about their meaning predicts it — verbs describing nearly the same act can select opposite patterns, which is exactly what makes 'enjoy to read' and 'suggest to go' feel reasonable and score zero.
Why it matters in the exam
In B2 First this distinction shows up in Part 1, where you choose between verbs with different patterns, and in Part 4, where you restructure without changing meaning. It grazes Part 2 as well — but note what is actually missing there: the gerund is already printed and the gap is <strong>the preposition that forces it</strong> ("looking forward ___ seeing you"). Failing here does not cost you an ending: it costs the whole answer.
The cognitive trap
"Your instinct: reaching for the infinitive after any verb — "she avoided to answer the question""
Why your brain does this: the to-infinitive is the default way English links two verbs, so it becomes the form your pattern-completion reaches for when nothing else is signalled. Because the sentence stays perfectly understandable, nothing in the reading experience flags the error.
She avoided answering the question. — avoid always selects -ing
The rule: some verbs select -ing and no amount of meaning will change that. And one signal is absolute — after any preposition, the verb takes -ing. That includes the 'to' in fixed expressions like 'look forward to', where 'to' is a preposition rather than an infinitive marker.
Recognition pattern
In the exam, look for the key signal first. The answer follows.
Signals that call for -ing
"She avoided answering the question." — avoid, mind, can't stand, can't help
"He finished writing the report at midnight." — enjoy, finish, give up
"They suggested taking a different route." — suggest, consider, recommend
"I'm looking forward to seeing you again." — that 'to' is a preposition, which is why it takes -ing.
Errors the exam is built to catch
"She avoided to answer the question during the interview."
The infinitive is the default link between two verbs in English, so it arrives unprompted. Avoid does not accept it.
"She avoided answering the question during the interview."
Avoid selects -ing in every tense and every register.
"We discussed to go by train instead of driving."
Discuss never takes an infinitive. Note also that it takes no preposition — 'discuss about' is a separate, equally common error.
"We discussed going by train instead of driving."
Discuss takes -ing directly, with no preposition in between.
"Do you mind to wait a few more minutes?"
Grammatically impossible, and audible: this one tends to survive into speech long after it has been corrected on paper.
"Do you mind waiting a few more minutes?"
Mind takes -ing, and this question is one of the most frequent polite formulas in the Speaking paper.
"They suggested to take a different route."
One of the most persistent errors at B2, because the meaning is entirely clear and the structure is entirely wrong.
"They suggested taking a different route."
Suggest takes -ing — or a that-clause: 'they suggested that we take a different route'.
"I can't help to laugh when he tells that story."
'Can't help to' would suggest an inability to assist — a different sentence entirely, not a broken version of this one.
"I can't help laughing when he tells that story."
Can't help means 'be unable to stop yourself' and takes -ing.
Why your brain gets it wrong
The learner's short circuit
Analyse the trap by exam format
When the teacher asked who was responsible, Jake avoided 1 a direct answer and changed the subject.
The pull is towards to give, because the to-infinitive is the default way English joins two verbs and it slots in without resistance. But avoid selects the gerund, so the option dies on structure while still making perfect sense.
The meaning gives you no warning
Both forms describe the same act, so nothing in the sentence signals which is required. The information lives in the verb, not in the context — which is why this cannot be reasoned out and has to be known.
Strategy
Read the verb before the gap first and ask which pattern it selects. If you cannot recall, check for a preposition: if there is one, the answer is -ing regardless of everything else.
It would be better if we didn't go out in the rain. We should ______ out in the rain. (AVOID)
You hold on to the meaning so tightly that the structure travels word by word, and the to-infinitive arrives as the default connector. But the key word fixes the verb, and the verb fixes the pattern — <strong>avoid</strong> takes -ing, so 'avoid to go' fails while saying exactly the right thing.
AVOID
The key word decides more than the vocabulary: it decides the structure that has to follow it.
→ avoid going
Right idea, wrong pattern, zero marks
Part 4 is the least forgiving place for this error, because there is no partial credit for having understood the sentence. The pattern is not decoration around the answer — it is the answer.
Strategy
Once the key word gives you the verb, stop and name its pattern out loud before writing anything. The pattern decision belongs before the sentence, not after it.
Verb + gerund patterns is 1 of 82
The exam tests 82 grammar competencies across 19 families. Mastering one is the first step. Automating all 82 is passing.
Related competencies